News 
 State News 
 Grains and Cropping 
 General 
 GM trials extended 

GM trials extended

02 Dec, 2010 02:00 AM
TRIALS of genetically modified wheat and barley will be expanded to the Lower North next year despite the South Australian Government remaining committed to its moratorium on the commercial production of GM crops.

Minister for Agriculture Michael O'Brien and the Commonwealth Office of the Gene Technology Regulator approved the increase in trials this year.

The trials will be undertaken by the Australian Centre for Plant Functional Genomics, which is preparing for its second harvest of GM wheat and barley lines at its Glenthorne site in Adelaide's south.

ACPFG research fellow Dr Andrew Jacobs said multinational companies were looking with interest on research undertaken in SA on GM crops, despite any commercial release of GM wheat or barley being at least eight years away.

Trials on GM canola and Indian mustard are being conducted by Bayer CropScience at Naracoorte and Lucindale. In a statement to Stock Journal, Bayer said it had been conducting small-scale research and innovation field trials to develop a new high performance hybrid canola. The trials have been run since 2006.

"We believe plant biotechnolgoy will play a vital role in improving Australian agricultural productivity and a positive impact on the local economy," the company said.

Last year was ACPFG's first GM trial plot taken through to harvest. A crop was planted the year before but because of late licence approvals, it was sown too late and Dr Jacobs said, destroyed before it set seed so that researchers did not have to conduct post-harvest monitoring. But this issue was not expected to arise again because the ACPFG was this year awarded a five-year trials licence.

Within that licence, the ACPFG is allowed to sow GM crops at three specific locations: Glenthorne, in SA's Lower North and at Corrigin, Western Australia. Glenthorne is the only location that has had trials established so far, with plans to sow in the Lower North and Corrigin next season.

"The Corrigin site has salinity problems so it's going to be very useful for us," Dr Jacobs said.

The ACPFG will have access to a further two sites next year, as part of the WA government's plans to establish trials in Merredin and Katanning.

"The WA government is going to fence off a 5ha area and have dedicated equipment for GM trials with laboratories on site," Dr Jacobs said. "The government is hoping organisations like ACPFG and CSIRO and other universities will use those facilities on a fee for service basis.

"For ACPFG, it will extend the range in which we can plant and give us access to other environments."

* Full report in Stock Journal, December 2 issue.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
What's the problem with trials? How will government and farmers know if GM is worth pursuing in SA if they don't conduct trials?
Posted by SA Comments, 2/12/2010 12:00:08 PM, on Stock Journal
The problem I see occurring with trials of GM canola is that pollination of other varieties, including related weed species, will occur within a radius of 6 km. There are now weed species resistant to glyphosate through this process. If the herbicide resistant gene is dominant, then will everybody who grows canola be paying royalties because the trial was not controlled? It would not be in the interests of the GM companies to prevent this occurring.
Posted by Not convinced, 2/12/2010 3:41:37 PM, on Stock Journal
Well now I know this government of idiots has rocks for brains.Their research staff obviously fall down on the job.The information from the EU and America shows that there are problems as the EU has banned GM use, and warnings out of the states tell about animals tested on some of these products are INFERTILE at the 3rd generation level and the damage done to major organs is a precursor to human problems as well.Check the problems with GM cotton it is there to see but obviously our researchers are blind and deaf to the information available.This material from the USA is as good as the information on WMDs and flu pandemics..wake up before it's too late your being conned by experts in spin and media mike and has cronies are the same all spin,no substance and all lies.
Posted by Brains, 2/12/2010 4:57:53 PM, on Stock Journal
The problem with trials is GM. This is still a new technique, the ramifications of which we still do not know, but with a growing catalogue of worrying helath problems as seen in independent feeding trials. The fact that these novel foods have not been properly tested, and are allowed unlabelled in our foods is a huge problem, as reflected by more than 90% of people who would like to see transparent labelling so they can choose whether to take part in what Ignacio Chapela has called "the largest biological experiment humanity has ever entered into". Test the product properly, peer review the results , demand feeding trials and total transparency, and stop the seed companies cherry picking data to get their products approved.

When this is done, and if they are safe then you can have your trials.

Posted by Hebe, 2/12/2010 6:45:10 PM, on Stock Journal
These GM foods are UNWANTED by the vast majority of people almost everywhere. The only categories of people who want these are the experimenter$ who stand to gain and the other gainer$ who are known as politician$($ell u$ out). Consumers DO NOT WANT these products. The tide is rising even in USA where they have had GM for some time. Still the majority of people there would NOT eat it if they could. Notice too that America has huge health problems, obesity, stagnant or reducing longevity, an amazingly high iatrogenic(medically induced) damage or death-rate, psychological/financial/ ethical/ judicial / teen/educational/ morale/ problems in ever increasing numbers. In short, the US is not a good lead to follow in just too many areas. It is possible that just one of these areas is contaminating the others. Perhaps its something they are consuming: medicines, GM, chemicals, bad science, bad information.......something is wrong there that's for sure. We need to follow our own path that is slightly different and use good HONEST science and debate to wend our way forward. We can lead the way without compromising the future. A LOT of good people are starting to say just the same thing.
Posted by bob, 2/12/2010 6:52:45 PM, on Stock Journal
BAN FIELD TRIALS UNTIL GM FOOD IS TESTED SAFE & LABELLED.

Ref: http://www.aaemonline.org/gmopost.html

"In May 2009, the American Academy of Environmental Medicine concluded .... a causal relationship between GM foods and infertility, accelerated aging, dysfunctional insulin regulation, changes in major organs and the gastrointestinal system, and immune problems such as asthma, allergies, and inflammation...

Because GM foods have not been properly tested for human consumption, and there is ample evidence of probable harm, the AAEM asks:

1. Physicians to educate their patients, the medical community, and the public to avoid GM foods ... and provide educational materials concerning GM foods and health risks.

2.Physicians to consider the ... role of GM foods in the disease processes of the patients they treat and to document any changes in patient health when changing from GM food to non-GM food.

3... begin epidemiological research to investigate the role of GM foods on human health...

4. For a moratorium on GM food, implementation of immediate long term independent safety testing, and labeling of GM foods, which is necessary for the health and safety of consumers."

Posted by Alice, 3/12/2010 2:01:27 AM, on Stock Journal
They have been trialling GM for over quarter of a century and still have not come up with the answer but their trials have ruined many farmers around the world. Search Google for "problems with GM crops" instead of talking nonsense! Most of Europe won't have a bar of GM. wonder why? Are they all stupid? Why did Tasmania ban it ? Are they stupid? Ask farmer Willmott? His crop ruined. I suppose he must be stupid too. Do the research instead of listening to Monsanto--or is that too hard?
Posted by creeker, 3/12/2010 6:29:15 AM, on Stock Journal
Monsanto is monopolizing what we grow, how and when. Should not this be enough to reject it? Never mind the negative impact to our health, the environment and the destruction of the planet and its diversity. Corruption, crime and mafia is rampant and politicians do not have the best interest of the people nor do they represent us; but the interest of the multinationals. Corporatocracy is taking over, the media is controlled and people are even beginning to believe that GM is good for us. Wake up before it is too late. Do your research. See the law suits against GM and against Monsanto in the US and EU. Let's keep Australia Clean, Green Sustainable and healthy. What is wrong with the natural, organic and normal (As nature intended) way of living?
Posted by Save our planet, 3/12/2010 11:57:19 AM, on Stock Journal
GMOs are not “Natural” or “Green”

It is misleading for companies to classify genetically modified organisms (GMOs) as “Natural” or “Green.”

Genetic engineering doesn’t happen in nature. Scientists force genes from bacteria and viruses into plant DNA, which result in dangerous side effects.

Already The North American Academy of Environmental Medicine urges all doctors to prescribe non-GMO diets to everyone.

GMOs are not “Green.” GMOs use far more herbicides, (From Monsanto) damage soil and marine ecology, harm beneficial insects, and cross pollinate. Their self-propagating genetic pollution will outlast the effects of climate change and nuclear waste!

Tell Quaker, Kellogg’s and others: “Stop misleading us”

Quaker’s “Natural” Granola contains corn flakes and soy lecithin. Kellogg’s Kashi brand “All Natural” Frozen Chicken Florentine uses soy flour and canola oil. Surprise! These are derived from GM plants.

We all should insist that these and other companies either remove their “Natural” claim, or better yet remove their GM products alltogether.

Posted by Apollo, 3/12/2010 12:28:34 PM, on Stock Journal
GM food are safer than organic foods - lots of science shows this. The problem is lack of knowledge of the DNA and scaremongering and then fear takes control. What we need is some catch up. Corn, soy, cotton, canola, sugar beet and many other crops have been GMed for years and this has kept food prices down and no health incident in the 14 years since adoption. Time to get educated folks or risk running out of food in 10 years time!
Posted by Food for the future, 3/12/2010 2:26:40 PM, on Stock Journal
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
WITH trials of genetically modified wheat and barley looking at traits such as heat and drought stress tolerance and nitrogen use efficiency, Pinery farmer Andrew Barr believes they offer valuable information to farmers.
WITH trials of genetically modified wheat and barley looking at traits such as heat and drought stress tolerance and nitrogen use efficiency, Pinery farmer Andrew Barr believes they offer valuable information to farmers.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES

Most popular articles




Stock Journal







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...